USPTO serial 74232852
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Charlottesville, VA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN, ESQUIRE
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN ESQ OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLLELAND, MAIER ET ALFOURTH FL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 1995 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 26, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 26, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 1992 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |