Drawing for CORE KNOWLEDGE

USPTO serial 74232852

CORE KNOWLEDGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, CRAIG
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CORE KNOWLEDGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JEFFREY H. KAUFMAN, ESQUIRE

JEFFREY H KAUFMAN ESQ OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLLELAND, MAIER ET ALFOURTH FL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016educational materials; namely, a series of booklets, newsletters, pamphlets and articles related to curriculum development in grades K-12ABANDONEDSep 1, 1991
041educational consulting services in the field of curriculum development in grades K-12ABANDONEDSep 1, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jan 12, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jan 11, 1995EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Jul 26, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
May 26, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 26, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 27, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 1, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 4, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 23, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 7, 1992AMPXAPPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance