USPTO serial 74239567
ECO-800
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECO-800?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PIANO DI SORRENTO, IT
PIANO DI SORRENTO, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond C. Stewart
RAYMOND C STEWART BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH AND BIRCH301 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22046-0747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electric motors for machines, couplings for machines; and belts for other than land vehicles | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | surveying chains, electronic multiparametric measuring probes, fire extinguishers, and electronic signal processors | ABANDONED | — |
| 012 | vehicles; namely, antipollution boats | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | non-metallic floating dams | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ECOLMARE SPA
- Other trademarks owned by ECOLMARE SPA
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named ECO-800
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |