USPTO serial 74241341
SUN RYPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUN RYPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence A. Maxham
LAWRENCE A MAXHAM SYMPHONY TOWERSBAKER, MAXHAM, JESTER & MEADOR750 "B" ST STE 2770SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dehydrated fruits; preserved and frozen fruits; applesauce; and fruit pie fillings; namely, apple, blueberry, raisin and cherry | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | granola bars | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | fruit juice combos, fruit juice blends, carbonated fruit juices and beverages, fruit drinks, pure fruit juices, fruit juices prepared from concentrates, fruit nectars, fruit cocktails, fruit beverages, sweet cider, frozen juices, and frozen fruit juice concentrates | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sun-Rype Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Sun-Rype Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SUN RYPE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 6, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 12, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |