USPTO serial 74242009
DINENET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 22, 1995
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DINENET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Riverwoods, IL
Riverwoods, IL
Riverwoods, IL
Riverwoods, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas D. Rosenwein
THOMAS D ROSENWEIN SCHAEFER, ROSENWEIN & FLEMING221 N LASALLE STSTE 683CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | electronic payment; namely, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data; and credit card services and credit card verification services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 3, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SPS PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPS PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SPS PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SEARS PAYMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named DINENET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 8, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 28, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |