USPTO serial 74246077
CAE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BATTLE, KENNETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2J1, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl M. Zielaznicki
KARL M ZIELAZNICKI KANE, DALSIMER, SULLIVAN, KURUCZ, ET AL711 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4059UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | repair and machine shop services; namely, rebuilding railway car axles and other parts for the railroad industry; axle machining services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 18, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |