Drawing for ENERGIZER

USPTO serial 74248980

ENERGIZER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2174106Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 21, 1998
Examiner
HANKIN, NANCY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGIZER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Darren J. Jones

DARREN JONES LOWE GRAHAM JONES PLLC701 FIFTH AVENUESUITE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98104

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010orthotic inserts for shoesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMar 14, 1986

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2016C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Sep 28, 2016CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 20, 2016CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 26, 2015PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 13, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 26, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2008RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 24, 200889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Sep 24, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jul 21, 2008E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 7, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 15, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 1, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 4, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 30, 2004C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 18, 2004815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 18, 2004E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 1998R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 6, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 14, 1995UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 11, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 18, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 28, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance