USPTO serial 74248980
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NORTHWEST PODIATRIC LABORATORY, INC.
Blaine, WA
Other trademarks owned by NORTHWEST PODIATRIC LABORATORY, INC.
NORTHWEST PODIATRIC LABORATORY, INC.
Blaine, WA
Other trademarks owned by NORTHWEST PODIATRIC LABORATORY, INC.
BELLINGHAM, WA
FERNDALE, WA
NORTHWEST PODIATRIC LABORATORY, INC.
Blaine, WA
Other trademarks owned by NORTHWEST PODIATRIC LABORATORY, INC.
FERNDALE, WA
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | orthotic inserts for shoes | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 14, 1986 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2016 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2015 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 26, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |