USPTO serial 74249688
TREASURE ISLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TREASURE ISLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Bruce Prout
D BRUCE PROUT CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALEPOST OFFICE BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 27, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 8, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 11, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 9, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 21, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |