Drawing for REFLECTIVES

USPTO serial 74252520

REFLECTIVES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REFLECTIVES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard J. Minnich

RICHARD J MINNICH FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET AL1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006metal house and general purpose numbers and lettersABANDONEDJan 1, 1974

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 3, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 26, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 22, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 7, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 19, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 3, 1993JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 16, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 18, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance