USPTO serial 74257165
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Chicago, IL
Bedford Hts., OH
Bedford Hts., OH
Chicago, IL
Bedford Hts., OH
Chicago, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald A. Belfer
GERALD A BELFER22061 LIBBY RDBLDG 9 NO 303BEDFORD HTS, OH 44146| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | jewelry; namely, bracelets for the wrist and ankle, necklaces, rings, pins, brooches, earrings and pendants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 12, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2001 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2001 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 6, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 17, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 19, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 5, 1994 | EX1M | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1994 | EX1D | SOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |