USPTO serial 74258512
RED LEAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RED LEAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | chewing tobacco | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1994 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |