Drawing for LASERLYNX

USPTO serial 74259353

LASERLYNX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LASERLYNX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen G. Rudisill

STEPHEN G RUDISEILL ARNOLD, WHITE & DURKEEP O BOX 4433HOUSTON, TX 77210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009adapter for connecting printers and plotters to computersABANDONEDNov 29, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 1995OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 1, 1995ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
May 1, 1995OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999
Jan 5, 1995OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Jun 23, 1994ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
May 24, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 22, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 4, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 24, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Feb 23, 1993ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Aug 25, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 4, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 1, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance