USPTO serial 74259896
NOTBURGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 1998
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NOTBURGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LONGA LIFE VEGETARIAN PRODUCTS PTY. LTD.
Yatala, Queensland, AU
Other trademarks owned by LONGA LIFE VEGETARIAN PRODUCTS PTY. LTD.
LONGA LIFE VEGETARIAN PRODUCTS PTY. LTD.
Yatala, Queensland, AU
Other trademarks owned by LONGA LIFE VEGETARIAN PRODUCTS PTY. LTD.
LONGA LIFE VEGETARIAN PRODUCTS PTY. LTD.
Yatala, Queensland, AU
Other trademarks owned by LONGA LIFE VEGETARIAN PRODUCTS PTY. LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PERLA M KUHN
PERLA M KUHN HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP1 BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004-1482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | hamburger sandwiches made with meat substitutes or alternatives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LONGA LIFE VEGETARIAN PRODUCTS PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by LONGA LIFE VEGETARIAN PRODUCTS PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by LONGA LIFE VEGETARIAN PRODUCTS PTY. LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named NOTBURGERS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 28, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 1997 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 21, 1995 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 16, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 20, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 30, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Mar 18, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 4, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |