USPTO serial 74260989
WILD WEST C.O.W.-BOYS OF MOO MESA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WILD WEST C.O.W.-BOYS OF MOO MESA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | education and entertainment services; namely, production of live and animated shows for entertainment of audiences; production and distribution of a continuous series of animated adventure shows, all for television, radio and cinema audiences; production of cinema films, video tape production services; recording studio services; publishing of stories, episodes and scripts for theatrical use; amusement park services | ABANDONED | Sep 12, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |