USPTO serial 74261011
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Woodbridge, Ontario, L4L 5Y4, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | commercial building and office cleaning services | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |