USPTO serial 74261025
TV PASS CARD READY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TV PASS CARD READY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toyonaka-shi, Osaka-fu, 561, JP
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | satellite communications system; namely, antenna, receiver, modulator, CRT, central processing unit, printer, keyboard, television, amplifier, outlets, timer, mixer, video tape recorder, wiring, pay-per-view control box | ABANDONED | Jun 21, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 10, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |