USPTO serial 74261572
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | carbonated spring water beverages | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |