Drawing for Serial No. 74261572

USPTO serial 74261572

Serial No. 74261572

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MIRMAN, DONNA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74261572?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032carbonated spring water beveragesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 20, 1994PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jun 27, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 23, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Apr 22, 1994CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 22, 1994CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Apr 22, 1994ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 21, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 3, 1994CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER
Jan 25, 1994CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Dec 20, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Nov 18, 1993CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 22, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 23, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 29, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 26, 1992ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance