USPTO serial 74261588
EASY STREET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EASY STREET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian J. Laurenzo
BRIAN J LAURENZO DAVIS, HOCKENBERG, WINE, BROWN, ET ALTHE FINANCIAL CTR666 WALNUT ST STE 2500DES MOINES, IA 50309-3993Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | wood finishes for use on flooring | ABANDONED | May 24, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 29, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 5, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |