Drawing for EASY STREET

USPTO serial 74261588

EASY STREET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EASY STREET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian J. Laurenzo

BRIAN J LAURENZO DAVIS, HOCKENBERG, WINE, BROWN, ET ALTHE FINANCIAL CTR666 WALNUT ST STE 2500DES MOINES, IA 50309-3993

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002wood finishes for use on flooringABANDONEDMay 24, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 1996ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 29, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 5, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 5, 1996EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 27, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 27, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 6, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 5, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 24, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance