USPTO serial 74261668
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
New York, NY
SNAKE CREEK MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by SNAKE CREEK MANUFACTURING CO., INC.
New York, NY
Wilmington, DE
New York, NY
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's and boys' clothing; namely, shirts, shorts, pants, jackets and swimwear | ABANDONED | Jun 18, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 4, 1998 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 21, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |