Drawing for MEDIA WORKS

USPTO serial 74261857

MEDIA WORKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIA WORKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA HALE AND DORR60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware; namely, computers, video digitizers, audio digitizers, analog to digital audio converters, National Television Standards Committee to red-green-blue synchronization video and signal converters, sync generators, video local area network controllers, video monitor controllers, monitors; computer programs for use in video editing; audio amplifiers and loud speakersABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 12, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Dec 16, 1993EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 19, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 28, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Feb 25, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 1992UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jul 20, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 10, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance