Drawing for SAVE THE PLANET

USPTO serial 74262339

SAVE THE PLANET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FICKES, JERI J
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAVE THE PLANET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016magazine on the subject of conservationism, and appliques in the form of decalsACTIVE
025clothing; namely, swimwear, T-shirts, jackets, hats, pants and sweatshirtsACTIVE
028equipment sold as a unit for playing a board game, and toys; namely, toy simulated writing instruments, plates, cups and eating utensilsACTIVE
029fruit based snack foods, prepackaged and precooked entrees consisting primarily of chicken, vegetables, beef, pork or fish, meats, yogurt, processed vegetarian and potato chipsACTIVE
030cookiesACTIVE
032fruit juices, soft drinks, flavored waters, mixtures of mineral waters and juice, and bottled fresh and carbonated watersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Sep 15, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 23, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Oct 22, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 17, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
May 14, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 19, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 11, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 7, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 18, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 8, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 3, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 1, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 22, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 22, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 17, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 12, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance