USPTO serial 74264006
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
MICHAEL D FISHMAN DYKEMA GOSSETT1577 N WOODWARD AVESTE 300BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-2820| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | prepared meal consisting primarily of chicken | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |