USPTO serial 74264506
AP ANNA PEGOVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AP ANNA PEGOVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Claude MOUSSALLI epouse ABDO HANNA
CEP, 01425 SAO PAULO - S.P., BR
Other trademarks owned by Claude MOUSSALLI epouse ABDO HANNA
Claude MOUSSALLI epouse ABDO HANNA
CEP, 01425 SAO PAULO - S.P., BR
Other trademarks owned by Claude MOUSSALLI epouse ABDO HANNA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur Schwartz
ARTHUR SCHWARTZ FOLEY & LARDNER3000 K ST NW STE 500P O BOX 25696WASHINGTON, DC 20007-8696Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes; essential oils for personal use; cosmetics; namely, cosmetic skin creams, eye shadow, eyebrow paints, mascara, face powder, foundation cream, emulsion preparations for exfoliation, face cleansing cream, suntan cream, eye liner, face powder for compacts, skin lotions, make-up removers, nail polishes, lipstick, rouge, and blusher; hair shampoo; hair products; namely, hair gel, hair tonic for conditioning, and hair conditioner; toilet soaps, dentifrices | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | preparations for hygiene; namely, astringents, medicated lip balm, medicated skin lotions and acne medications | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Claude MOUSSALLI epouse ABDO HANNA
- Other trademarks owned by Claude MOUSSALLI epouse ABDO HANNA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named AP ANNA PEGOVA
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1993 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |