Drawing for VOICEDIALING

USPTO serial 74264555

VOICEDIALING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SUSSMAN, RONALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOICEDIALING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038telecommunication servicesABANDONEDJun 28, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 29, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 29, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 29, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 14, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 8, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 3, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 28, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 14, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 1993SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Aug 27, 1993EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jul 22, 1993IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED
Jul 22, 1993EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 21, 1993EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 6, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Nov 17, 1992NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 25, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 26, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance