USPTO serial 74265217
ACTIVATE PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACTIVATE PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Previto
JOSEPH J PREVITO STOLL, MISKIN, PREVITO & HOFFMAN350 FIFTH AVE STE 6110NEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | spreader/activator for use in connection with agricultural pesticides | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 20, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 20, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 15, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 11, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1995 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 23, 1995 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |