USPTO serial 74272164
ITX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ITX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec H3Z 3C1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
TUCKER, FLYER & LEWIS, PC NORM D ST LANDAUSTE 4001615 L ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; namely, computers; computer terminals; video controllers; display controllers; computer monitors; video monitors; word processors; apparatus for recording, reproducing, and transmitting sounds and images; namely, loudspeakers, microphones, headphones, add on sound cards, graphic accelerators, CD-ROM players and disks and tape backup systems; recording supports; namely, batteries, battery chargers, selector switches, and tapes, diskettes and cassettes for use in connection with the storage of micro-computer digital data; calculating machines; computer peripherals; compact blank magnetic disks and video blank magnetic disks; blank optical numerical disks; data processing apparatus; namely, data processing machines, data recorders; namely, machines which record computer digital data; units for visualizing and printing; namely, computer screens, disk drives, modems; joysticks; printers; namely, computer printers, laser printers; systems and equipment; namely, scanning cameras, microfilm machines, data recorders and producers; namely, machines which record and produce computer digital data, sheet sorter, hard disk storage systems; namely, hard disk drive, disk and disk controllers for the acquisition, treatment, stocking, operation and diffusion of data origination from text and/or images; and computer programs for use by small businesses and individuals in the field of accounting, word processing, education, entertainment and design | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1993 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |