USPTO serial 74272359
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Georg Seka
J GEORG SEKA TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | accident, fire, health, life and marine insurance services; life assurance services; accident insurance underwriting; fire insurance underwriting; health insurance underwriting; life insurance underwriting; marine insurance underwriting; capital investments; financial management; financial and fiscal valuations; fiscal assessments; financial investment analysis services; fund investments; financial guarantee services; financial credit services; trusteeship agency services; surety services; financial brokerage services; securities brokerage; stocks and bonds brokerage; property office management; real estate agencies; real estate appraisal; renting of sites, offices, flats and apartments; leasing agents (commercial); apartment house management; leasing of real estate | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1994 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |