USPTO serial 74272590
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Carter
DAVID M CARTER CARTER & SCHNEDLER56 CENTRAL AVE #103P O BOX 2985ASHEVILLE, NC 28802| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | decorative pillows | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | textile products; namely, bed sheets; comforters; bedspreads; quilts; draperies; curtains; tie-backs for use with curtains and draperies; quilted fabric for use in the manufacture of bedspreads, comforters, quilts and the like; duvet covers; place mats; napkins; table covers; shower curtains; pillow cases; mattress pads; shams; and dust ruffles | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 23, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 23, 1994 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 27, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |