USPTO serial 74274067
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda L. Berkowitz
LINDA L BERKOWITZ LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | banking services; financing and financial transactions; monetary transactions; electronic funds transfer; electronic point of sale transactions; eomputerized electronic banking services; automatic teller services; bank-account card services and card-based banking transaction services | ABANDONED | — |
| 038 | communication via computer | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | computer programming for others; rental and design of computer programs | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1997 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |