USPTO serial 74275163
SYNTRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SYNTRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Manchester, CT
Manchester, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FRED S. WHISENHUNT
FRED S WHISENHUNT GRIFFIN BUTLER WHISENHUNT & KURTOSSYSTE PH-12300 NINTH ST SARLINGTON, VA 22204-2396Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | non-woven porous fabric in continuous sheet form made of synthetic fibers and capable of being thermally sealed for conversion by others into packaging, commercial, household and filtration products | ABANDONED | Apr 16, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 4, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 13, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 1995 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1993 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |