USPTO serial 74275485
DART TARGET SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUNG, SARAH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DART TARGET SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Earl C. Hancock
EARL C HANCOCK3445 PENROSE PL #210BOULDER, CO 80301UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | leasing electronic archery target simulating and scoring systems; providing facilities for archery; namely, an electronic archery target simulating range | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 16, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 20, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 6, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |