USPTO serial 74276731
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra L. Seamans
SANDRA L SEAMANS SNELL & WILMERONE AZ CTRPHOENIX, AZ 85004-0001UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in manufacturing, namely inventory management, order entry processing, purchasing, shop floor control, master scheduling, materials requirements planning, and capacity requirements planning, and also for use in financial applications, namely accounts receivable, accounts payable, and general ledger management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 5, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 15, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 20, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 10, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 1993 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Apr 19, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |