USPTO serial 74281176
JUST BETWEEN US
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRUN, JEAN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JUST BETWEEN US?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sharon E. Groom
SHARON E GROOM225 DUNCAN MILL RD6TH FLDON MILLS, ON M3B 3K9Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | mail-order catalogues in the field of personalized gift items, excluding greeting cards | ABANDONED | Sep 15, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |