USPTO serial 74288561
WARP DRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTER, SASHA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WARP DRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mickleover, Derby DE3 5XX, GB
Mickleover, Derby DE3 5XX, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger T. Frost
ROGER T FROST JONES, ASKEW & LUNSFORD37TH FL191 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30303-1769Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | intelligent disk drive arrays comprised of disk drives and controllers, disk storage systems comprised of disk drives and controllers, hierarchical storage systems comprised of disk drives and controller hardware, RAID (Redundant Array Independent Drive) disk drives, disk input-output accelerators, file servers, computer disk drives, and database accelerators | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 21, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |