USPTO serial 74292029
SMARTKART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1906411Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 1995
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTKART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | surgical instruments; namely, endoscopes, optical couplers, canula, trocars, endoscopic video cameras, fibre optic light sources, micro-surgical blades, tubing and cable for surgical purposes, endoscopic hand instruments, hydro-dissection pumps, laser and electro-surgery knives, endoscopic suction devices, irrigation devices, insufflators, and parts and attachments used with all of these instruments; medical furniture; namely, movable carts and storage cabinets to hold surgical instruments during surgical procedures, carrying cases for surgical instruments and poles and supports to hold lighting devices and fluids for IV and irrigation uses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 13, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Seitz Technical Products, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Seitz Technical Products, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Seitz Technical Products, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named SMARTKART
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2006 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 30, 1995 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 1994 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 1993 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 29, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |