USPTO serial 74293126
BLUE HEART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNELIUS, ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLUE HEART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
E. Thomas Watson
E THOMAS WATSON PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN2600 CHARLOTTE PLZCHARLOTTE, NC 28244UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | women's high fashion shoes made from European lasts | ABANDONED | Mar 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 7, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 7, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 15, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 23, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |