USPTO serial 74295048
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter T. Cobrin
PETER T COBRIN COBRIN, GITTES & SAMUEL535 MADISON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | anti-fog lens spray | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | optical handsoap and hot/cold facial masks | ABANDONED | — |
| 008 | tablet crushers with pill container and pill splitters | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | contact lens cases | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | heating masks for applying either heat or cold to the face, ear plugs for noise reduction and eye bath containers | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | lens tissue | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | medicine organizers, vitamin dispensers and pill cases | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | bottle openers and drinking cups with pill container | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | ear plugs for swimming use, swim goggles and nose clips for swimming | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 25, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 1994 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |