Drawing for STAR SEED

USPTO serial 74295497

STAR SEED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHANAHAN, PATRICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAR SEED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce J. Clark

BRUCE J CLARK COMMERCE BANK BLDG DOWNTOWN100 E 9TH ST 2ND FLP O BOX 3555TOPEKA, KS 66603-3555

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001natural chemicals; namely, bacteria strains in an inoculant peat base for the purpose of stimulating seed growthABANDONED
031seeds for agricultural purposes only; namely, wheat, sorghum, alfalfa, soybeans, grass, corn, millet and oatsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 1994PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Aug 15, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
May 20, 1994ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 21, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance