Drawing for CRAMP GUARD

USPTO serial 74296618

CRAMP GUARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MAJOR, SCOTT J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRAMP GUARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William T. Hough

WILLIAM T HOUGH LIBERTY CORNERP O BOX 326LIBERTY CORNER, NJ 07938UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005oral dietary calcium supplement used for the treatment or prevention of hypocalcemic tetanyABANDONEDNov 30, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 15, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 15, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 15, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 13, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
May 3, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 27, 1993PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED
Sep 21, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 2, 1993CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 18, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 4, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 5, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 28, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance