USPTO serial 74296618
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William T. Hough
WILLIAM T HOUGH LIBERTY CORNERP O BOX 326LIBERTY CORNER, NJ 07938UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | oral dietary calcium supplement used for the treatment or prevention of hypocalcemic tetany | ABANDONED | Nov 30, 1988 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 15, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 15, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 13, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1993 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Sep 21, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 2, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |