Drawing for FLEETCON

USPTO serial 74299449

FLEETCON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CONN, WILLIAM A.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLEETCON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela Chinn Woodbury

ANGELA CHINN WOODBURY MCGINNIS, LOCHRIDGE & KILGORE, LLP1300 CAPITOL CTR919 CONGRESS AVEAUSTIN, TX 78701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009systems for vehicle fleet operators for tracking the locations of fleet vehicles equipped with global positioning system receivers, and radio transmitters and receivers, and which facilitates scheduling movements of the vehicles; the systems consist of global positioning system receivers, computer hardware, software and peripherals; namely, personal computers, computer workstations, file servers, computer cabling, laser printers, computer programs and program documentation, and radio transmitters, receivers and modems, all depending on the configuration of the specific system, and utilize a global positioning system; namely, low Earth orbit satellites which transmit high frequency signals received by the global positioning system receiver installed in a vehicle for calculating the vehicle locationABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 1995ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 1995PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 19, 1994PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER
Nov 30, 1994PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED
Sep 12, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Sep 9, 1994ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 15, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 10, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 10, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 9, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 28, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 28, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance