USPTO serial 74299999
TECNICA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHILDRESS, J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECNICA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Valencia, CA
Valencia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul W. Vapnek
PAUL W VAPNEK TOWNSEND AND TOWNSENDSTEUART ST TWR 20TH FLONE MARKET PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | scissors, shears, razors, razor blades, tweezers, fingernail clippers, nail files, manicure implements; namely, nail and cuticle scissors, nail buffers, cuticle pushers, nail files and nail clippers, manicure implement sets, pedicure implement sets | ABANDONED | Jan 29, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 1994 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 28, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 29, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |