USPTO serial 74300112
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
32027 Taibon Agordino, IT
ASSOCIATION POUR LA DEFENSE ET AL PROMOTION DE L'OEUVRE DE MARC CHAGALL, DITE COMITE
PARIS, FR
32027 Taibon Agordino, IT
32027 Taibon Agordino, IT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Baxley, Joseph T. Murray and James F. Baxley
CHARLES E BAXLEY HART BAXLEY DANIELS & HOLTON90 JOHN ST STE 309NEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | eyeglasses, eyeglass frames, spare parts for eyeglasses; namely, screws, hinges and supports | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 2, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2008 | RRGD | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT DENIED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | RFRR | REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 27, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 1996 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 1994 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |