USPTO serial 74301312
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marshall W. Sutker
MARSHALL W SUTKER LAFF, WHITESEL, CONTE & SARET401 N MICHIGAN AVE STE 1700CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | automated assembly equipment; namely, control equipment for fastening machines; namely, load sensors, computers, computer interfaces and related software | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 1996 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1995 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 1995 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1995 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 1994 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 1994 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |