Drawing for MERLA

USPTO serial 74306696

MERLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MERLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randall C. Brown

RANDALL C BROWN HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP3100 NATIONS BANK PLZ901 MAIN STDALLAS, TX 75202-3789

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006side pocket mandrels, gas lift mandrels, mandrels for use in oil and gas wells; static design plungers for use in plunger - lift type oil wellsABANDONEDDec 1, 1935
007pheumatically operated valves for use in gas lift applications in oil wells; pneumatically operated valves for use with tubular conduits; namely, pipes; well head bumpers for use in plunger-lift type oil wells; dynamic design plungers for use in plunger-lift type oil wells; static design plungers for use in plunger-lift type oil wells; pneumatically operated pumps for injecting chemicals into earth wellsABANDONEDDec 1, 1935
009manually operated valves for use with tubular conduits; namely, pipes; mechanically operated injection valves for injecting fluids into earth wells; electronic control devices for well pumping control systems; electronic control devices for controlling mechanized valves; electronic control devices for controlling pumpsABANDONEDDec 1, 1935
011catalytic space heaters which use propane or butane as fuelABANDONEDDec 1, 1935

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 1994ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 12, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1993UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jun 17, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 15, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance