Drawing for STINK

USPTO serial 74310143

STINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond A. Kurz

RAYMOND A KURZ ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & KURZ, PCSTE 701 E555 13TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toy action and play figures and accessories therefor, mechanical action toys, action skill games, action-type target games, air mattresses for recreational use, toy airplanes, stuffed toy animals, plush toy animals, toy armor, toy arrows, card games, balloons, toy banks, baseballs, bathtub toys, bean bags, toy blocks, board games, video games and video game cartridges, cases for dolls, action figures and for play accessories, computer game cassettes, video game machines, amusement park rides, Christmas tree decorations, action figure character clothing, computer game accessories; namely, cartridges, cassettes, discs, programs, tapes, hand held units for playing video games, costume masks, party favors in the nature of crackers or noisemakers, jugsaw and manipulative puzzles, kites, ride-on toys, magic trick kitsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 1996ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 28, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 6, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 28, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 28, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 18, 1994ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Jun 28, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 27, 1994NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 3, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 18, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 16, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 8, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 8, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance