USPTO serial 74316531
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sergei Orel
Sergei Orel Baker and Rannells PA92 East Main StreetSuite 302Somerville, NJ 08876| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfume and cosmetics; namely, moisturizing skin cream, cleansing cream, loose face powder, pressed face powder, foundation make-up, lipstick, eye shadow, blushers, mascara, eyeliner, eye pencils, lip pencils, nail enamel, hair shampoos, hair conditioners and hair rinses | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | eyeglasses and sunglasses | ABANDONED | — |
| 014 | jewelry | ABANDONED | — |
| 018 | handbags, tote bags, wallets, purses and luggage | ABANDONED | — |
| 024 | home furnishings; namely, sheets, towels, blankets, comforters, pillowcases and curtains | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | lingerie, overcoats and children's clothing; namely, dresses, skirts, blouses, jackets, pants, shirts, blazers, pullovers, cardigans, overalls and socks | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 26, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 1997 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1996 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 1996 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1996 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 1995 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 1995 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1994 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 22, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 31, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 1993 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |