Drawing for TAHARI

USPTO serial 74316531

TAHARI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHAW, THOMAS V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAHARI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sergei Orel

Sergei Orel Baker and Rannells PA92 East Main StreetSuite 302Somerville, NJ 08876

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003perfume and cosmetics; namely, moisturizing skin cream, cleansing cream, loose face powder, pressed face powder, foundation make-up, lipstick, eye shadow, blushers, mascara, eyeliner, eye pencils, lip pencils, nail enamel, hair shampoos, hair conditioners and hair rinsesABANDONED
009eyeglasses and sunglassesABANDONED
014jewelryABANDONED
018handbags, tote bags, wallets, purses and luggageABANDONED
024home furnishings; namely, sheets, towels, blankets, comforters, pillowcases and curtainsABANDONED
025lingerie, overcoats and children's clothing; namely, dresses, skirts, blouses, jackets, pants, shirts, blazers, pullovers, cardigans, overalls and socksABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 10, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 19, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Oct 26, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 16, 1997EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Apr 23, 1997EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Dec 26, 1996EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Oct 23, 1996EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 27, 1996EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 25, 1996EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 6, 1995EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 24, 1995EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 14, 1995EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 21, 1995EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Oct 25, 1994NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 22, 1994ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Feb 1, 1994PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 29, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 28, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Sep 27, 1993LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED
Mar 29, 1993CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 10, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 28, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 17, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance