USPTO serial 74324113
TROUBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TROUBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark N. Mutterperl
MARK N MUTTERPERL FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | men's, women's and children's wearing apparel; namely, skiwear; namely, jackets, coats, pants, hats and gloves, and sportswear; namely, blazers, pants, skirts, shorts, vests, dresses, shirts, suits, blouses and belts | ABANDONED | Feb 22, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 16, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 6, 1993 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |