USPTO serial 74332782
ICD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Clearwater, FL
Clearwater, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary L. Shaffer
GARY L SHAFFER FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 5003000 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | medical and surgical supplies and devices, namely bandages for skin wounds, surgical bandages, wound dressings, bandage-like infection control barriers for attachment to skin, medical adhesive tape, medical plasters, disinfectant-impregnated bandages, surgical tape and wound dressing applicators sold as a component of wound dressings | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | surgical and examination gloves, external incontinence apparatus in the nature of adhesively attachable drainage devices for use on the bodies of incontinent persons, cardiac catheters, angioplasty catheters, injection port fixation apparatus for attaching injection ports to body surfaces, infection control shields for use with medical appliances which breach the skin, catheter fixation apparatus for attaching catheters and other medical appliances to body surfaces, uninary drainage catheters, sexual infection control apparatus comprising membranous shields, and apparatus for applying wound dressings to body surfaces, all for use in all fields of medicine | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 16, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 16, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1994 | WRDA | WITHDRAWAL OF REFUSAL DURING APPEAL | — |
| Dec 2, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 26, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |