USPTO serial 74335078
SANWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SANWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Allen
DAVID ALLEN VAN COTT, BAGLEY, CORNWALL & MCCARTHYP O BOX 45340SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer equipment; namely, distributed processors, interface cards, and cables; computer software for use in controlling and integrating computer memory devices and computer peripherals; namely, magnetic disk drives, optical storage devices, and tape drives | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 7, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 1996 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 27, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |