Drawing for COMPUTER INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 74344701

COMPUTER INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MARKS, MARTIN H.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMPUTER INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea Van Kampen

ANDREA VAN KAMPEN ZIFF COMMUNICATIONS COMPANYONE PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016printed matter; namely, reference and training manualsABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 1995PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Nov 29, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 24, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Oct 28, 1994ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 24, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 22, 1994CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 16, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance