USPTO serial 74345814
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marvin Petry
MARVIN PETRY LARSON AND TAYLOR727 TWENTY-THIRD ST SARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | charitable services, namely organizing and conducting an incentive program which recognizes academic skills and performance or community services through the distribution of sporting apparel | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1993 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2002 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 14, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 30, 1994 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 1994 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 30, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1994 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |